Background Image
Previous Page  3 / 32 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 3 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

But investors actually play a vital role during softer market

conditions. Investors assist in growing the supply of new

dwellings and provide rental accommodation for those who

cannot afford to purchase, or are saving to buy a property.

The strength of recent investor demand for off-the-plan

dwellings has also provided a boost to the national economy

with the current construction boom creating new jobs and

supporting local communities.

So what attracts investors to property in Australia?

Over the past two years there have been a number of key

drivers attracting higher than normal levels of investors in the

residential property market in Australia. These include:

¡

¡

Record low interest rates.

¡

¡

Volatility in other investment assets classes e.g. equity

markets.

¡

¡

Low returns on other assets classes e.g. government

bonds and term deposits.

¡

¡

The perceived security of bricks and mortar.

The 2015 LJ Hooker Investor/Tenant survey

LJ Hooker recently undertook a major survey of landlords

around the country to gain further insight in the drivers of

residential property investors around the country.

Boosting wealth and setting up retirement

The results also showed how an investor’s property portfolio

transforms in line with their journey through life. Investors aged

between 18 and 24 own two properties on average while those

close to retirement (55 to 64) own more than three properties.

Then at the age of 65 investors sell down a proportion of their

portfolio, to help fund their retirement, with the 65+ age group

owning an average of just under two properties.

Income doesn’t limit investment

Property investment is not just limited to the wealthy. The survey

showed that 37% of landlords have an annual household

income of under $100,000 per year. A further 29% earn

between $100,000 and $150,000 and 34% have an income of

more than $150,000 per year.

A balanced investment strategy dominates

One of the key drivers pushing investors to invest during

the current cycle has been the strong capital growth seen

particularly in Sydney and Melbourne. Our survey results show

that while a majority of investors take a “balanced” investment

strategy (58%), a large proportion do view “capital growth” as a

vital part of their investment strategy (27%), compared to those

just focusing on “yield” (15%).

Investors search far and wide for the right property

The mobility of the investors is also highlighted in our survey with

just 16% owning an investment property within 5 kilometres

of where they live. The majority of investors (28%) have an

investment property “more than 20 kilometres but in the same

state” of where they live while 14% invest in a different state to

the one where they live.

Negative gearing plays an important role

As expected negative gearing plays an important role in a

typical property investment strategy with 55% stating that it

was “important” or “very important” to them. In addition to this,

31% said that they would sell some, or all, of their investment

properties if negative gearing was abolished.

Conclusion

The broad and diverse demographic mix, of property

investors provides a key insight into why so much public and

media attention is afforded to the residential property market.

In addition our survey shows that property investment

transcends age and plays a vital role in creating wealth through

all stages of life.

An insight into the mind of a property investor

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

UNDER 18 18 to 28 25 to 34 35 to 44

Investor Age

Average number of investment properties

45 to 54 55 to 64 65+

Investment properties by age group

Investors have long played a vital role in the development and evolution of

the Australian property market. Some public debates created a negative

perception around the recent increase in investor activity, claiming it priced out

first home buyers in a competitive market, while negative gearing was an impost

on the tax base.

Source: LJ Hooker Investor Survey 2015

1